A stop isn't a number you're comfortable with. It's the price that proves the idea wrong. Put it where the structure breaks, then size the trade to fit that distance. Pick the number first and you've only chosen where to be wrong quietly. ⚠️ Not financial advice. This is educational analysis, not a recommendation to trade. Trading leveraged products carries a high risk of losing your capital; past or simulated results don’t predict future performance. Only risk what you can afford to lose. Full disclosure: racktor.co/risk-disclosure

The same size, the same rules, the same reasons, every single day. Nothing about that is exciting and none of it is meant to be. The days you remember are usually the ones that cost you. ⚠️ Not financial advice. This is educational analysis, not a recommendation to trade. Trading leveraged products carries a high risk of losing your capital; past or simulated results don’t predict future performance. Only risk what you can afford to lose. Full disclosure: racktor.co/risk-disclosure

Decide what a trade is allowed to cost you before you decide how big it is. The stop goes where the idea breaks, and the size is whatever fits that. Do it the other way round and the chart stops being the thing making the decision. ⚠️ Not financial advice. This is educational analysis, not a recommendation to trade. Trading leveraged products carries a high risk of losing your capital; past or simulated results don’t predict future performance. Only risk what you can afford to lose. Full disclosure: racktor.co/risk-disclosure