We’re building Multyr to make DeFi capital allocation more structured, transparent, and risk-aware. But building a protocol also means recognizing where we still have room to improve. We want to hear your honest opinions. What do you think is Multyr’s biggest weakness at our current stage of development? Is it the product, strategy transparency, risk management, documentation, user experience, communication, or something else? No feedback is off the table. If something feels unclear, incomplete, or needs more work, we want to know. The goal isn’t just to build what we think DeFi needs. It’s to understand what users actually expect from a capital allocation protocol. What should we improve first?

Public protocol launch ≠ TGE. A public protocol launch and a token-generation event are not the same milestone. For Multyr, the current planned sequence keeps them separate: presale → audited public protocol launch → later TGE. The protocol should reach public launch based on its own technical and security requirements. Token distribution follows its own launch path. Combining both into one date would make that distinction disappear. We prefer to keep it explicit.