Here is how ours is meant to work. AI research surfaces credible projects, the community discusses them, and from Phase 7 they can launch through the launchpad. Launchpad activity then feeds back into the AI, so the research gets better.
Each part feeds the next, and we are building them in order: social first, then AI, then launchpad.
🔷 No custody of your funds, at any layer
🔷 Data minimization: only what’s needed to run the service
🔷 A public Trust Score, with its calculation disclosed
Web3 research today: 4 apps, 4 logins, 4 chances to be wrong.
Screener for data. Discord or X for sentiment. Snapshot for governance. Wallet to actually act. By the time you're done, your first tab's data is already stale.
The problem was never that any single tool was bad. It's the switching cost between them, invisible until you count the steps.
Glunity collapses that loop into one flow: see a signal, research it, discuss it, vote, act, without a new tab.
And your Trust Score, built from what you've actually done, only lives here. Not portable, not a screenshot.