Телеграм канал «green path»

🥩 “Humans are omnivores. We are meant to eat meat.”

Then eat it raw.

Not: “Humans cannot eat raw meat.”
But: “Humans are the only animal that needs technology in order to eat meat.”

No carnivore and no omnivore in nature — from the lion to the bear — needs fire, a freezer or a veterinary inspector to eat meat. The brown bear is an omnivore whose diet is mostly plants, and it still catches salmon and eats it raw. The chimpanzee shares 98.8% of our DNA and eats its kills raw.

Only one animal on Earth cannot.

An animal that cannot eat a food without technology is not built for that food.

📖 Full argument → Part 8

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

"But we have canine teeth!" 🦷

Meet the hippopotamus. Fifty centimetre canines — the largest of any land
mammal on Earth.

It eats grass.

Now look at the lion, an actual carnivore: seven centimetres. Smaller than
a musk deer. Smaller than a camel. Both of which have never eaten meat in
their lives.

Here is what canine teeth are actually for: fighting rivals. That is why,
in every species that has large ones, the males have huge canines and the
females do not. They are weapons for combat and display, not tools for
eating.

And human canines? Male and female human canines are the same size. Ours
are not weapons, and they do not even protrude past the teeth beside them.

Yours is one centimetre, flat-tipped, and the only thing it has ever
"torn" is meat that had to be cooked for an hour first to become soft
enough to chew.

A hippo could bite a boat in half with teeth it uses on grass.
You need a stove.

📚 Full breakdown in Part 1 and Part 8 of The Complete Guide.

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #canineteeth
#scientific #science

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

🍀 THE COMPLETE GUIDE: Every Argument Against Veganism, Answered

Fifteen posts. The fifteen objections people actually raise — every one
answered with science, sources, and logic, not opinion.

Save this post. The next time someone repeats one of these, send them
the link.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🦷 THE HUMAN BODY — Are we built for meat?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 1 — "We have canine teeth. Humans are omnivores."
22 Reasons Why Humans Are Herbivores
Jaw movement, intestine length, hands, sweat, instinct — twenty-two
anatomical facts, every one of them pointing the same way.
👉 [LINK]

PART 2 — "Where do you get your protein? Plants aren't complete."
Plant Protein: Complete, Abundant, and Nothing Like "Just Grass"
The "incomplete protein" myth, the combining myth its own author
retracted, the real numbers, and the question that answers itself:
where does the cow get its protein?
👉 [LINK]

PART 3 — "You need supplements. That proves it's unnatural."
The B12 Question: A Lost Vitamin Is Not Proof of a Carnivorous Past
No animal on Earth makes B12 — not even a lion. Why gorillas, horses
and rabbits share our exact "limitation," and why the one gene humans
really did lose proves the opposite of what meat-eaters claim.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🌾 THE DEFLECTIONS — "But what about plants and crops?"
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 4 — "Plants feel pain too."
Do Plants Feel Pain? Science Says No
No brain. No nervous system. No nociceptors. Reaction is not sensation.
👉 [LINK]

PART 5 — "Vegetarians are killers too — crops kill insects."
Are Vegetarians Also "Killers"? A Deeper Look at a Common Excuse
80% of farmland on Earth grows animal feed. Meat-eating is two layers
of killing, not one. The argument collapses on its own arithmetic.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
☠️ THE HEALTH COST
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 6 — "Meat isn't harmful."
Heterocyclic Amines in Cooked Meat and Their Carcinogenic Potential
What forms in flesh at high temperature, why the WHO classifies it,
and what it does to DNA.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔥 "IT'S NATURAL, IT'S OUR CULTURE"
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 7 — "It's our culture. Everyone eats meat."
Speciesism and the Geography of Habit: Who Actually Chose Your Plate?
A cow is sacred in India and dinner in Argentina. A dog is family in
Europe and food elsewhere. If your ethics change with your postal code,
they were never ethics. They were an inheritance.
👉 [LINK]

PART 8 — "Humans have always eaten meat. And you cook rice and bread too!"
The Fire Test: If Humans Are Carnivores, Why Must We Cook?
No carnivore on Earth cooks. We must. Raw flesh gives us tapeworms that
reach the brain; cooked flesh gives us carcinogens. And heating a plant
is not the same act — skip the fire and rice is merely unpleasant, while
chicken puts you in a hospital.
👉 [LINK1]

👉 [LINK2]

PART 9 — "It's natural. Animals eat each other."
"It's Natural — Animals Eat Each Other"
A lion cannot survive on plants. You are standing in a supermarket. The
lion has no choice and therefore no responsibility; you have both. And
if "natural" were truly your standard, you would have to give up
medicine, clothing and electricity first.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🐄 THE ANIMALS THEMSELVES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 10 — "But my meat is humane, free-range and grass-fed."
"But My Meat Is Humane, Free-Range and Grass-Fed"
Chicken: killed at 6 weeks, lifespan 8 years. Pig: 6 months, lifespan
20 years. Every label changes the beginning and none of them changes
the ending. "Humane" has never once included growing old.
👉 [LINK]

PART 11 — "Nobody dies for milk and eggs."
Dairy and Eggs: "But Nobody Dies for Milk"
A cow gives milk for the same reason a woman does — she gave birth. Her
calf is taken within hours, her sons become veal, and she is slaughtered
at a quarter of her lifespan. Around seven billion male chicks are killed
every year on the day they hatch, because they cannot lay eggs.
👉 [LINK]

PART 12 — "Fish don't feel pain."
"Fish Don't Feel Pain"
Fish have nociceptors. Painkillers stop their pain behaviour — a reflex
cannot be switched off by morphine. They will abandon a preferred
environment to reach relief. Between one and three trillion are killed
each year, with almost no legal protection anywhere on Earth.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
👶 IS IT SAFE?
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 13 — "A vegan diet is dangerous, especially for children."
"A Vegan Diet Is Dangerous — Especially for Children"
The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics states plainly that plant-based
diets are appropriate for ALL stages of life — pregnancy, infancy,
childhood, adolescence and elite athletics. Plus the soy hormone myth,
and the double standard that calls nuggets and soda "normal."
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🌍 THE PLANET
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 14 — "What does any of this have to do with the environment?"
The Land, the Water and the Air: What Animal Farming Actually Costs
Livestock occupies 80% of the world's farmland and provides 18% of its
calories. One kilogram of beef costs as much water as fifty kilograms of
vegetables. And 77% of global soy is fed to animals — so the Amazon is
not being cleared for tofu.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🍀 THE LAST EXCUSES
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PART 15 — "It's my personal choice."
"It's My Personal Choice" — and Every Remaining Excuse
A choice stops being personal when someone else dies in it. Plus: what
would happen to all the animals, farmers' jobs, "my grandfather lived to
95," "vegan food is expensive," and "nobody's perfect" — each one
answered, and the whole series summarised in a single paragraph.
👉 [LINK]

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Fifteen objections. Not one of them survives examination.

Every claim in these fifteen posts is sourced from peer-reviewed research
and from the official positions of the WHO, the FAO, and the world's
dietetic associations.

Read them in order, or jump straight to the one you need.

No one is asking you to be perfect.
Only to stop using excuses you have never examined.

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
#guide #faq #animalrights

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

📚 PART 15 OF 15 — The Complete Guide

"It's My Personal Choice" — and Every Remaining Excuse 🍀

This is the final post in the series, and it answers the arguments people
reach for once the others have run out.

1. "It's a personal choice. Stop pushing your views."
A personal choice is one whose consequences fall on the person making it.
Your clothes, your music, your religion, your career — all personal.

A choice stops being personal the moment there is a second party in it who
did not consent and does not survive.

You are not being asked to justify a preference. You are being asked to
justify an outcome that happens to someone else.

And consider who is actually having something imposed on them here. It is
not the person being asked an uncomfortable question at dinner.

2. "Don't preach at me."
Fair enough — nobody enjoys being lectured, and self-righteousness has
probably cost this movement more people than it has gained.

But notice the shape of the objection. It is about tone, not about
content. It is a complaint about how the argument was delivered, offered
in place of a reply to what the argument actually said.

If the case is wrong, say why. If the only available criticism is that it
was raised impolitely, then the case was not wrong.

3. "What would happen to all the animals if everyone went vegan?"
There is no population of farmed animals waiting to be released.

Around eighty billion land animals are brought into existence every year
by deliberate breeding and artificial insemination, because they have been
ordered in advance by demand.

Demand does not vanish overnight; it declines gradually. As it declines,
fewer animals are bred. That is the entire mechanism. Nobody opens the
gates and floods the countryside with cattle.

The question assumes these animals exist independently of us. They do not.
They exist because we make them, at exactly the rate we intend to eat them.

4. "Farmers would lose their jobs."
Demand shifts; it does not disappear. People will still eat — they will
eat more grains, legumes, vegetables, fruit, and oils, all of which are
grown by farmers. Agricultural transitions have happened repeatedly
throughout history, and they are managed with policy, retraining and
investment.

But examine the principle underneath the sentence. "People earn a living
from it" has never, in any other context, been accepted as sufficient
justification on its own. Every industry that has ever been ended on
ethical grounds employed people. That fact mattered, and it was addressed —
but it was never treated as the end of the discussion.

5. "My grandfather ate meat every day and lived to ninety-five."
Someone's grandfather also smoked for sixty years and lived to ninety-five.
That is how statistics work: individual outcomes vary enormously, and a
single long life tells you nothing about population-level risk.

The relevant evidence is what happens across millions of people over
decades, not what happened to one person who also had good genes, an
active life, and food that bore little resemblance to what is sold today.

6. "Vegan food is expensive."
The cheapest calories available anywhere on Earth are plant foods: rice,
lentils, beans, chickpeas, oats, potatoes, flour, seasonal vegetables.
This is precisely why they form the foundation of traditional cooking in
nearly every culture, especially among people with little money.

What is expensive is meat, and what is expensive is the new category of
processed vegan replacement products — the burgers, the cheeses, the
packaged substitutes. Those are entirely optional, and they are not what
plant-based eating is built on.

A pot of lentil stew with rice is among the cheapest meals a human being
can make.

7. "But people in deserts and the Arctic can't farm."
Correct. And entirely irrelevant to anyone reading this on a phone with a
supermarket nearby.

Ethics addresses those who have a choice. If you genuinely have no
alternative, this conversation was never aimed at you. If you are
selecting between fifteen options in a refrigerated aisle, you are not in
that situation, and borrowing the circumstances of someone who is does not
transfer to you.

8. "Nobody is perfect. I could never be 100%."
Nobody is asking for perfection, and anyone who demands it has
misunderstood the point entirely.

There is no membership card and no purity test. The question has never
been whether you can achieve zero harm — nobody can. The question is
whether, knowing what you now know, you are willing to reduce it.

Perfection is not available. Direction is.

9. "I've already cut down."
Then you have done something real, and you should hear that plainly rather
than be told it is insufficient. Every meal counts on its own. A person
who halves their consumption has halved their contribution, and that is
not nothing — it is arithmetic.

Nobody who is moving in this direction needs to be attacked for not having
arrived.

In Conclusion — All Fifteen Parts in One Paragraph
Our anatomy is that of a plant-eater. Plant protein is complete and
abundant. B12 is a bacterial vitamin that sanitation removed from
everyone. Plants have no nervous system and cannot suffer. Most farmland
feeds livestock, so meat-eating causes more crop deaths, not fewer.
Cooked flesh produces carcinogens, and raw flesh produces parasites. Which
animals we eat is decided by geography, not by ethics. Fire is required to
make meat survivable and optional for almost every plant. Nature is a
description, not a permission. Humane labels change the beginning and
never the ending. Dairy and eggs kill the calf, the male chick, and
eventually the mother. Fish feel pain and die in trillions without
protection. Plant-based diets are endorsed for every stage of human life.
And four fifths of the world's farmland produces less than a fifth of its
food.

That is the whole case. Every piece of it is sourced, and none of it
depends on believing anything unusual.

The Only Thing Left
After all fifteen parts, one thing remains that no article can supply.

You already know that you would not want this done to a dog. You already
know that you could not watch it happen and continue eating. You already
know that the animal wanted to live.

The arguments in this series exist only to remove the excuses that were
standing between you and something you already understood.

Nobody is asking you to be perfect.
Only to stop using reasons you have never examined.

Start with one meal.

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #personalchoice
#scientific #science #guide

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

📚 PART 14 OF 15 — The Complete Guide

The Land, the Water and the Air: What Animal Farming Actually Costs 🌍

Set ethics aside completely for this post. Assume, for the length of this
text, that animals do not matter at all. The numbers still do not work.

1. The Single Most Important Statistic in Food
The largest study ever conducted on the environmental impact of food —
covering roughly forty thousand farms across one hundred and nineteen
countries — found this:

Livestock occupies about 80% of global agricultural land.
Livestock provides about 18% of the world's calories.
Livestock provides about 37% of the world's protein.

Four fifths of all farmland on Earth, for less than a fifth of the food.

If any other system delivered 18% of an output while consuming 80% of the
input, it would be shut down as broken. In food we call it dinner.

2. Why the Loss Is Unavoidable
This is not inefficiency that better farming could fix. It is a law of
energy.

At every step up a food chain, roughly 90% of the energy is lost — spent
on the animal's movement, body heat, breathing, and the parts nobody eats.

Grow crops and feed them to an animal, and you throw away the great
majority of the food you grew in order to produce a smaller amount of
different food. You cannot engineer around thermodynamics.

3. Emissions
Food production accounts for roughly a quarter of all global greenhouse
gas emissions, and animal products are responsible for well over half of
food's total — while supplying a fraction of its calories.

The same landmark study calculated that a global shift away from animal
products would reduce food's land use by around 76%, its greenhouse gas
emissions by around 49%, acidification by around 50%, and eutrophication
by around 49%.

Three quarters of the farmland on this planet could be returned to forest
and grassland. There is no other single decision available to an
individual with an effect of that size.

4. Water
Litres of water required to produce one kilogram:

Beef about 15,400
Pork about 6,000
Chicken about 4,300
Pulses about 4,000
Cereals about 1,600
Fruit about 960
Vegetables about 320

A single kilogram of beef consumes roughly as much water as fifty
kilograms of vegetables.

Shortening your shower is a reasonable habit. It is not in the same
category of magnitude as what is on the plate.

5. The Forest
Cattle ranching is the largest single driver of deforestation in the
Amazon. Land is cleared, burned, and converted to pasture, and more is
cleared to grow feed for animals elsewhere.

This is not a side effect of beef production. It is how new beef
production is created.

6. "But Vegans Destroy the Amazon With Soy"
This argument gets repeated constantly, and it is precisely backwards.

Roughly 77% of the world's soy is fed to farmed animals.
Roughly 7% is eaten directly by humans as tofu, tempeh, soy milk and
similar foods.
The remainder goes mainly to oil and industrial uses.

Soy is not primarily a human food. It is primarily animal feed. The
expansion of soy across South America was driven by demand for meat, not
by demand for tofu.

The person eating tofu is responsible for a sliver of that 7%.
The person eating beef is the market for the 77%.

If you are genuinely worried about soy and the Amazon, the single most
effective action available is to stop eating the animals that the soy is
grown to feed.

7. The Ocean
Industrial fishing has driven a large proportion of assessed fish stocks
to their biological limits or beyond. Bottom trawling flattens seafloor
ecosystems. Bycatch kills dolphins, turtles, sharks and seabirds as
routine waste. (See Part 12.)

Meanwhile, fertiliser runoff — much of it applied to feed crops — creates
oxygen-depleted dead zones at river mouths, some of them thousands of
square kilometres in size, where almost nothing can live.

8. The Honest Counterpoint
One objection deserves a fair hearing: some grazing land genuinely cannot
grow crops — steep terrain, arid rangeland, marginal soils — and animals
there convert inedible vegetation into food.

That is true, and it describes a real form of pastoral farming. But it
describes a small minority of global animal production, nothing close to
the volume the world currently consumes, and it cannot be scaled to meet
industrial demand. The overwhelming majority of meat comes from animals
fed on crops grown specifically for them, on land that could have grown
food for people.

It is an argument for a small amount of meat in specific geographies. It
is not a defence of the supermarket.

In Conclusion
You can recycle every container, replace every bulb, shorten every shower,
and refuse every plastic bag — and still have a smaller effect than
changing what is on your plate.

Four fifths of the farmland on Earth, for less than a fifth of the food.
Three quarters of that land could be given back.

The environmental case does not require you to care about animals at all.
It only requires you to look at the arithmetic.

Sources:
- Poore J, Nemecek T. (2018). "Reducing food's environmental impacts
through producers and consumers." Science, 360(6392), 987-992.
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaq0216
- Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. (2012). "A Global Assessment of the Water
Footprint of Farm Animal Products." Ecosystems, 15, 401-415.
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
- Gerber PJ, et al. (2013). Tackling Climate Change Through Livestock.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Ritchie H, Roser M. "Soy." Our World in Data — global soy use by
destination.
- Food and Agriculture Organization. The State of World Fisheries and
Aquaculture.

← Previous: [Part 13 — "A Vegan Diet Is Dangerous for Children"]
→ Next: [Part 15 — "It's My Personal Choice"]
📚 All fifteen: [The Complete Guide]

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #environment #climate
#scientific #science #amazon

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

📚 PART 13 OF 15 — The Complete Guide

"A Vegan Diet Is Dangerous — Especially for Children" 👶

This objection carries more emotional weight than any other, because it
comes wrapped in concern for a child. It deserves a direct, evidence-based
answer rather than reassurance.

1. What the Dietetic Profession Actually Says
The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics — the largest organisation of food
and nutrition professionals in the world — states in its official position
paper that appropriately planned vegetarian and vegan diets are healthful,
nutritionally adequate, and appropriate for individuals during ALL stages
of the life cycle, including pregnancy, lactation, infancy, childhood,
adolescence, older adulthood, and for athletes.

Comparable positions have been issued by the British Dietetic Association,
Dietitians of Canada, and dietetic bodies in several other countries.

This is not an activist claim. It is the formal position of the
professional bodies who certify the dietitians your doctor refers you to.

2. The Words "Well Planned" Cut Both Ways
Critics seize on that phrase as though it were a warning unique to plant-
based eating. It is not. Every diet requires planning to be adequate.

Consider what an unplanned omnivorous childhood diet looks like across
much of the world: nuggets, white bread, sugary drinks, processed meat,
almost no vegetables. Childhood obesity has reached levels previously
unseen in human history. Type 2 diabetes — once called adult-onset
diabetes because children did not get it — now appears routinely in
teenagers.

Nobody calls that diet dangerous. Nobody demands that those parents
justify themselves.

A single vegan child with an iron deficiency becomes a news story.
Millions of children on a diet that is measurably harming them is simply
called normal.

That is not concern for children's health. That is a double standard.

3. The Nutrients, Named Directly
Protein — lentils, chickpeas, beans, tofu, tempeh, peanuts, oats,
whole grains, seeds. (See Part 2.)
Iron — legumes, tofu, pumpkin seeds, dark leafy greens, dried
fruit. Serve with a source of vitamin C to multiply
absorption several-fold.
Calcium — fortified plant milk, calcium-set tofu, tahini, almonds,
kale, bok choy.
Zinc — legumes, nuts, seeds, whole grains; soaking and sprouting
improve absorption.
Iodine — iodised salt or seaweed.
Omega-3 — flax, chia, walnuts; algae oil for direct EPA and DHA.
Vitamin D — sunlight, supplemented in winter — advised for the general
population regardless of diet.
Vitamin B12 — supplement. Simple, cheap, non-negotiable. (See Part 3.)

That is the complete list. One supplement is genuinely required. The rest
is ordinary food.

4. "But Children Need Meat to Grow"
Children need calories, protein, fat, vitamins and minerals. Every one of
these is available from plants, and children have been raised on
predominantly plant-based diets across enormous regions of the world for
thousands of years.

What children do not need is any specific animal product. There is not one
nutrient in meat that a child can obtain from no other source.

5. "Vegans Are Weak"
Patrik Baboumian — strongman, world record holder in the log lift, vegan.
Scott Jurek — one of the greatest ultramarathon runners in history, vegan.
Carl Lewis — nine Olympic gold medals, and has stated his best competitive
season came after switching to a plant-based diet.
Lewis Hamilton — seven-time Formula One world champion, vegan.
Venus Williams — plant-based since her autoimmune diagnosis, and still
competing at elite level afterwards.

And beyond human athletes, the point made in Part 2 still stands: the
strongest and largest land animals on Earth — the gorilla, the elephant,
the bull, the horse — are all herbivores. Muscle is built from amino
acids, and amino acids are built by plants.

6. "Soy Will Give Men Breasts"
This myth comes from the word "phytoestrogen," which sounds alarming and
means something quite different from what people assume.

Phytoestrogens are plant compounds that are structurally similar to human
oestrogen but are not human oestrogen. They bind weakly, and preferentially
to a different receptor subtype, producing effects that are frequently the
opposite of oestrogen rather than the same.

Meta-analyses of the clinical trials consistently find that neither soy
foods nor isoflavone supplements have any measurable effect on
testosterone, oestrogen, or any other reproductive hormone in men.

And there is an irony worth stating plainly: the milk of a dairy cow
contains actual mammalian oestrogen and progesterone, at biologically
meaningful levels, because she is pregnant for most of the time she is
producing it.

The drink containing real mammal hormones is the one marketed to children
as healthy. The bean containing plant compounds that do nothing to human
hormones is the one treated as suspicious.

7. The Honest Part
A badly constructed vegan diet can harm a child. So can a badly
constructed omnivorous one. Nobody should pretend otherwise, and the rare
tragic cases that reach the news always involve parents who fed an infant
something that was not food — not parents who followed dietetic guidance.

The requirements are genuinely simple: adequate calories, a variety of
whole plant foods, and a B12 supplement. Children raised this way grow
normally, and tend to eat more fruit, more vegetables, and more fibre than
their peers.

In Conclusion
The official position of the world's dietetic associations is that
plant-based diets are appropriate at every stage of human life, including
infancy and pregnancy.

A diet of nuggets and soda is treated as normal and a diet of lentils,
fruit and vegetables as reckless. Examine which of those two is actually
producing the health crisis in children right now, and the concern starts
to look like something other than concern.

Plan it properly, take the B12, and a plant-based child is not at risk.
They are, on current evidence, eating better than most of their classmates.

Sources:
- Melina V, Craig W, Levin S. (2016). "Position of the Academy of
Nutrition and Dietetics: Vegetarian Diets." Journal of the Academy of
Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(12), 1970-1980.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.025
- Messina M. (2010). "Soybean isoflavone exposure does not have feminizing
effects on men: a critical examination of the clinical evidence."
Fertility and Sterility, 93(7), 2095-2104.
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.002
- Reed KE, Camargo J, Hamilton-Reeves J, Kurzer M, Messina M. (2021).
"Neither soy nor isoflavone intake affects male reproductive hormones:
An expanded and updated meta-analysis of clinical studies."
Reproductive Toxicology, 100, 60-67.
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.12.019
- British Dietetic Association. Food Fact Sheet: Vegetarian, vegan and
plant-based diet.

← Previous: [Part 12 — "Fish Don't Feel Pain"]
→ Next: [Part 14 — The Environment]
📚 All fifteen: [The Complete Guide]

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #scientific #science
#children #nutrition #soy

@GreenPathForAll 🍀

📚 PART 12 OF 15 — The Complete Guide

"Fish Don't Feel Pain" 🐟

More animals are killed for food from the sea than from the land — by an
enormous margin — and almost none of them are protected by any welfare law
anywhere on Earth. This post explains why that happened, and why the
reason given for it is not true.

1. Fish Have Pain Receptors
This was settled experimentally. Researchers identified nociceptors —
the specialised nerve endings that detect tissue damage — in the head and
face of rainbow trout, responding to pressure, heat, and chemical
irritation, with properties closely resembling those found in mammals.

The hardware for detecting pain is present. That is not disputed.

2. They Behave Like Beings in Pain, Not Like Reflexes
This is the part that matters, because a reflex and an experience are
different things.

Trout given a painful stimulus to the lips rocked from side to side,
rubbed their lips against the gravel and the tank walls, and stopped
eating for hours. Their breathing rate nearly doubled.

Then researchers administered morphine.

The behaviours stopped. The fish resumed eating.

A reflex cannot be switched off by a painkiller. A reflex is not sensitive
to analgesia — only a centrally processed experience is. That single
result separates "automatic reaction" from "suffering," and fish land on
the wrong side of it.

3. They Will Pay a Price to Escape It
Zebrafish given a choice between a preferred environment and a barren one
will normally choose the preferred. But if they have been given a painful
stimulus and the barren chamber contains dissolved painkiller, they move
to the barren chamber and stay there.

They gave up something they wanted in order to obtain relief. That is a
trade-off, a weighing of one state against another. Reflexes do not make
trade-offs.

4. "But Fish Have No Neocortex"
This is the standard objection, and it contains a hidden assumption: that
the specific brain structure mammals use for pain is the only structure
capable of producing it.

Birds have no neocortex either. Nobody argues that a parrot feels nothing,
or that a crow solving a multi-step puzzle is an unthinking machine.
Evolution routinely builds the same capability from different components.

In fish, the pallium appears to perform analogous functions. Requiring
fish to have a mammal's anatomy before we grant them a mammal's experience
is not science. It is a demand that other species resemble us before we
extend them consideration.

5. They Are Also Far More Intelligent Than Assumed
Cleaner wrasse have passed the mirror mark test — attempting to remove a
mark on their own body visible only in a reflection, a test long treated
as a benchmark for self-recognition and passed by very few species.

Fish use tools, build structures, recognise individual companions, learn
by watching others, cooperate across species while hunting, and retain
memories for months and years. The "three-second memory" is folklore with
no basis whatsoever.

6. The Scale
Estimates put the number of wild fish killed for food each year between
roughly one and three trillion, with tens of billions more raised in
aquaculture.

Trillion. It is the largest-scale killing human beings carry out, and most
people have never once pictured it.

7. How They Die
Nearly all land animals are legally required to be stunned before
slaughter. Fish, in most of the world, are not covered by any such
requirement.

Wild-caught fish typically die by suffocating in air on the deck of a
boat, over a period of minutes to hours. Others are crushed under the
accumulated weight of the catch in the net as it is hauled. Many are
gutted while still conscious. Deep-sea species suffer decompression
injuries as they are dragged up, with internal organs forced out of the
body.

If this were done to any land animal in any developed country, it would be
prosecuted.

8. And Everything Else in the Net
Industrial fishing does not catch only its target. Dolphins, sea turtles,
sharks, rays, and seabirds are hauled up as bycatch and thrown back dead
or dying. Bottom trawling drags weighted nets across the seafloor,
flattening ecosystems that took centuries to form.

You cannot eat ocean fish without funding this. It is not an occasional
accident of the industry; it is its ordinary daily operation.

9. So Why Do We Believe They Feel Nothing?
Be honest about the real reason. It has nothing to do with neuroscience.

A fish does not scream, because it cannot vocalise in air.
A fish has no facial expression — no eyebrows, no mouth that curves.
A fish does not bleed visibly in water.
A fish does not have a face that resembles ours.

We calibrate our empathy by resemblance. The more an animal looks and
sounds like us, the more we assume it feels. A fish fails every one of
those tests while possessing the nervous system that matters.

That is not an observation about fish. It is an observation about the
limits of human empathy — and it is exactly the mechanism described in
Part 7 of this guide.

In Conclusion
A fish detects injury, suffers from it, responds to painkillers, and will
sacrifice comfort to escape it.

It dies by suffocation, with no legal protection, in numbers measured in
trillions, inside an industry that destroys the seafloor and kills
dolphins and turtles as routine waste.

The silence of a fish has been mistaken for the absence of suffering.
It was never evidence of anything except that we cannot hear it.

Sources:
- Sneddon LU, Braithwaite VA, Gentle MJ. (2003). "Do fishes have
nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system."
Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270(1520), 1115-1121.
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2349
- Sneddon LU. (2019). "Evolution of nociception and pain: evidence from
fish models." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B,
374(1785). DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0290
- Brown C. (2015). "Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics." Animal
Cognition, 18(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0
- Kohda M, et al. (2019). "If a fish can pass the mark test, what are the
implications for consciousness and self-awareness testing in animals?"
PLoS Biology, 17(2), e3000021. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000021
- Mood A, Brooke P. Estimates of global numbers of fish caught annually.
fishcount.org.uk

← Previous: [Part 11 — Dairy and Eggs]
→ Next: [Part 13 — "A Vegan Diet Is Dangerous for Children"]
📚 All fifteen: [The Complete Guide]

#vegan #vegans #vegetarian #vegetarians #greenpath #fish #scientific
#science #ocean

@GreenPathForAll 🍀