Телеграм канал «The Irish Inquiry»

https://x.com/i/status/2023795734340939877

INISTER DOESN'T MENTION THAT HER HUSBAND'S RELATIVES' COMPANY BENEFITS FROM HSE BUDGET
By Susanne Delaney
At 17 seconds: note the exaggerated hair flip and head toss given at the exact moment you hear that little Irish girl Roxanne's parents had to crowdfund for life changing spinal surgery in the US because she was inexplicably removed from a waiting list in Ireland. This is the only toss Jennifer Carroll MacNeill will ever give about Roxanne, and it is a "couldn't be bothered" one.
A "transition/dismissal" move (a quick hair flip) can indicate a desire to change the subject, move on, or "reset" the interaction, can also indicate dismissiveness, contempt and irritation).
She looks at Ben (clip in comments) like a lizard surveying an insect (as he asks about why none of the HSE budget could be allocated to Roxanne). Cold, blank, emotionless. She goes on here about where all the money goes (€27 billion per year) in a manner that would seem to indicate it comes from her pocket.
The money goes on this and that, but somehow the money just can't be found for Roxanne or children like her, whose childhoods have been effectively stolen by this government.
The minister failed to talk about how some of the health budget pays her husband's relatives who own CPL healthcare, and who likely receive thousands per health care worker they recruit (I'm sure the background and qualifications checks are real thorough...given all that money to potentially look the other way).
MacNeill has publicly denied having personal financial ties to CPL, stating that she, her parents, and her husband do not own shares.
STILL SEEMS LIKE A MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST that ANYONE in her family would be benefiting from the HSE budget in a profiteering sense while she is Health Minister, no?
In 2020, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill stated she had "no knowledge" at all of CPL's HSE contracts.
I find this claim really difficult to believe.
In the clip below, the minister breezes through her rote memory script. Without apparent empathy, remorse, or regret. She will get a pat on the back for that. She does as she is told for her big pay packet.
Despite a healthy budget, our health system is not safe and not functioning. Maybe if they didn't spend so much money on public private "partnerships," the money would stretch more?
Remember when the HSE used to directly provide homecare instead of using private companies, for example? It was cheaper, and it was far better care (as profits and cheap labour were not the number one goal).
Just to add here that while I am thankfully not in Roxanne's parents' position, my 9 year old child was referred to Temple Street for a neck ultrasound on persistent enlarged lymph nodes and I did not receive an appointment letter. I reverted back to my GP, who contacted the hospital. They then wrote back, refusing to scan my child. A different doctor did initially try to make excuses for the refusal but then admitted to me (when I pushed) that this is likely because of long waiting lists rather than a clinical decision (the hospital shouldn't contradict a GP referral).
This second doctor subsequently found another enlarged node and seemed surprised at this. He also attested she should be scanned.
I had to investigate which clinics do a paediatric scan and found only one (The Beacon). The cost is €250 which, as a low income household, I don't have (but will have to find).
Furthermore, despite it being a private clinic, my child has to wait until at least April (possibly the end of) because they have a backlog. Probably because she isn't the only one who has been refused a public scan.
How many more children in need of scans have been refused even after a GP referral? How many of them could have a serious issue, and how many families won't be able to afford to have any potential issues diagnosed on time? Finally, how long will it be before we realise what's really happening to all our public money, as children are left abandoned?

MINISTER DOESN'T MENTION THAT HER HUSBAND'S RELATIVES' COMPANY BENEFITS FROM HSE BUDGET
By Susanne Delaney

At 17 seconds: note the exaggerated hair flip and head toss given at the exact moment you hear that little Irish girl Roxanne's parents had to crowdfund for life changing spinal surgery in the US because she was inexplicably removed from a waiting list in Ireland. This is the only toss Jennifer Carroll MacNeill will ever give about Roxanne, and it is a "couldn't be bothered" one.

Read on below...

You think you can no longer be shocked? We promise you, you CAN. Baby care brand posts "this is the closest your husband will ever get to a threesome" alongside a picture of their rectal baby thermometer. They also have posted on the box "How about a quickie?"

All the people who came up with this need to have their hardrives checked. There are forces at work attempting to desensitise us to CSA.

DO YOU SEE IT? Pat Kenny's nimbyism is being RIDICULOUSLY framed as heroic ("I'm delighted the badgers are still happy and alive"). The fact is he did not want a nursing home beside his massive Dalkey home. But when you don't want a few hundred men from God knows where (who, by majority, entered the country illegally without documents, and are not background checked) beside your home or beside your kids school or creche YOU are a far right scumbag.

Do we really buy that Pat Kenny gives a shiny shite about badgers? He doesn't. It is a cover story to hide the fact he is too entitled and spoilt to have some old people living beside his home (with cars coming and going, etc, a new building blocking his sunlight).

Kenny said he and his wife have "lived in harmony" with the badgers but he also said (which is closer to the truth) that "putting in a huge lump of construction beside people's back gardens".

The nursing home won't be built. Not because of some badgers (new builds will encroach on wild animals and trees, and that's not usually the bottom of the list of potential issues to consider). For example, in Breaffy Co Mayo, a new footpath is being built for the IPAS centre residents to the tune of 4 million euro, and dozens of mature trees have been hacked down for it.

Yet we are expected to believe some badgers were the deciding factor in this case? I really don't think so. The decision was made because a bunch of wealthy people decided they were not having it (one of whom is likely Pat Kenny's neighbour, good friend, and regular guest Luke O Neill). Now. Just imagine an IPAS centre was proposed? They'd lose their reason altogether. Yet they call you racist for not wanting one beside you and your family. The hypocrisy is sickening.

For what it's worth I love badgers, but again I ask you to think about this: hundreds of people will protest an IPAS centre and the Gardaí will come out in force to pepperspray, beat and push over even the youngest and oldest and even those who are just passing by these gatherings. Your legitimate concerns around safety of women and children and social cohesion mean nothing? Aren't worth considering? Nor any concerns regarding shoving hundreds of human beings into glorified camps? (in what suspiciously looks like greed and other agenda driven white collar human trafficking).

But the badgers matter to them?

Remember, Kenny has form.

In 2008, broadcaster the propaganda mouthpiece...sorry that was mistyped...the beloved broadcaster settled a high-profile, bitter, and costly High Court land dispute with his Dalkey neighbour, solicitor Gerard Charlton. The dispute involved ownership of a 0.2-acre strip of land, which the Kennys claimed via "squatter's rights" after using it since 1991. The case ended with the Kennys agreeing to purchase the land from the Charltons.

The dispute included tense, physical altercations, with Mr. Charlton alleged he was "jostled" and denied access to the land after the Kennys installed new security gates.

DO YOU SEE IT? Pat Kenny's nimbyism is being RIDICULOUSLY framed as heroic ("I'm delighted the badgers are still happy and alive"). The fact is he did not want a nursing home beside his massive Dalkey home. But when you don't want a few hundred men from God knows where (who, by majority, entered the country illegally without documents, and are not background checked) beside your home or beside your kids school or creche YOU are a far right scumbag.

Read on below...

"One of the sexual assaults carried out by her grandfather took place when he visited her for Eid celebrations, the trial heard." The abuse started aged 6. Very misleadingly, the press has reported they will be jailed for 100 years. When in fact this is the sum total of the sentences when you add up what each individual sentence.