Dear Colleagues and friends,
In our continuous effort to support robust and transparent science, we want to highlight a powerful platform that aligns with these values: OpenReview.net. More than just a tool, OpenReview represents a growing movement towards open scholarship, and we believe our authors can significantly benefit from its approach.
🔍What is OpenReview?
OpenReview is an open-source platform for scholarly communication, best known for pioneering open peer review. Its core principle is to move away from the traditional anonymous, closed review process to a model that promotes accountability, collaboration, and constructive dialogue.
The key features that define OpenReview are:
☑️Open Identities: Typically, both authors and reviewers are aware of each other's identities.
☑️Open Reports: Submitted reviews are often made public alongside the final published work.
☑️Open Interaction: A forum-like environment allows for direct, documented dialogue between authors, reviewers, and the public.
☑️Preprint Integration: The platform is deeply integrated with preprint posting, facilitating early feedback.
What is its Purpose?
The primary purpose of OpenReview is to improve the quality, fairness, and efficiency of peer review by introducing transparency. It aims to:
☑️Increase Accountability: Signed reviews encourage civility and thoroughness.
☑️Recognize Contribution: Reviewers receive public credit for their work.
☑️Accelerate Learning: The community learns from the review process itself, seeing how experts critique and improve manuscripts.
☑️Reduce Bias: Transparency can help mitigate hidden biases in the review process.
How Can Our Authors Benefit?
☑️Even if our journal currently uses a traditional review model, engaging with OpenReview can be an invaluable step before you submit your manuscript to us.
☑️Get Pre-Submission Feedback: Many conferences and communities host "open commenting" periods on OpenReview. You can upload a preprint and receive constructive feedback from a global pool of researchers before formal submission. This can help you identify weaknesses, strengthen your arguments, and improve clarity.
☑️Demonstrate Rigor: By participating in an open review process, you showcase your commitment to transparency and your confidence in your work. This can be a mark of a rigorous research process.
☑️Learn from Public Reviews: Reading the open reviews of other papers in your field is an exceptional way to improve your own writing and critical analysis skills. You see firsthand what reviewers look for and how they frame their critiques.
☑️Establish Priority: Posting a preprint on OpenReview timestamps your work, establishing the precedence of your ideas while the formal publication process is underway.
A Note on Journal Policy:
ℹ️We are closely monitoring the evolution of open peer review models. While we champion transparency, we also respect the need for reviewer anonymity in certain contexts. We view platforms like OpenReview as complementary to the traditional journal system, providing authors with additional tools to enhance their work.
We encourage you to explore OpenReview.net and consider how it might fit into your research workflow. Engaging with these innovative platforms makes you an active participant in shaping the future of scholarly communication.
Learn more:
https://openreview.net/