Каталог каналов Мои подборки Мои каналы Поиск постов Тарифы
Инструменты
Каталог TGAds Мониторинг Детальная статистика Анализ аудитории Бот аналитики
Полезная информация
Инструкция Telemetr Документация к API Чат Telemetr
Полезные сервисы

Не попадитесь на накрученные каналы! Узнайте, не накручивает ли канал просмотры или подписчиков Проверить канал на накрутку
Прикрепить Телеграм-аккаунт Прикрепить Телеграм-аккаунт

Телеграм канал «QA Community»

QA Community
1.4K
790
47
8
0
You can find it here:
- news
- real cases
- meetups and talks
- internship programs
- and sparkling humor

Cooperation: @evgeniybryk

FB channel: https://www.facebook.com/people/QA-Community/100086298857628
Подписчики
Всего
4 731
Сегодня
0
Просмотров на пост
Всего
391
ER
Общий
8.26%
Суточный
6.21%
Динамика публикаций
Telemetr - сервис глубокой аналитики
телеграм-каналов
Получите подробную информацию о каждом канале
Отберите самые эффективные каналы для
рекламных размещений, по приросту подписчиков,
ER, количеству просмотров на пост и другим метрикам
Анализируйте рекламные посты
и креативы
Узнайте какие посты лучше сработали,
а какие хуже, даже если их давно удалили
Оценивайте эффективность тематики и контента
Узнайте, какую тематику лучше не рекламировать
на канале, а какая зайдет на ура
Попробовать бесплатно
Показано 7 из 1 430 постов
Смотреть все посты
Пост от 08.09.2026 14:48
215
0
4
💡 SQL tip

One SQL topic especially useful for backend testing is subqueries.

A few patterns worth remembering:
🔹 IN (SELECT...) - dynamically filter records without manually copying IDs.
🔹 EXISTS - quickly check whether related data exists.
🔹 NOT EXISTS - find missing relationships. Very useful for spotting data inconsistencies.
🔹 WHERE value > (SELECT AVG(...)) - compare records against an overall value, such as an average.

The key takeaway: you don't need to memorize every syntax pattern. Think about what your main query needs and how another query can provide it.
For QA, this is especially useful when investigating API responses and checking what actually happened in the database.

📖 More details: Linkedin

#QA #SQL #SoftwareTesting #DatabaseTesting #BackendTesting
Пост от 03.09.2026 17:58
477
0
2
Who else is living this reality?

#bugHunter #BugMagnet #BugNeverSleeps #QAThings #QAInTheWild #QATeam
Пост от 31.08.2026 10:57
569
0
9
Testing the feature according to requirements vs testing it according to reality


#QALife #BugOrFeature #TesterProblems #QAcommunity
Пост от 26.08.2026 15:15
28
0
1
How to Prioritize Test Cases When You Have No Time

You’ll never have enough time to test everything. The real skill is knowing what to test first.

When deadlines are tight, I use a simple risk-based approach:
🔹 Prioritize high-impact and high-risk areas
🔹 Check what actually changed in the release
🔹 Cover critical user journeys
🔹 Use automation to identify testing gaps
🔹 Focus on modules with a history of defects
🔹 Timebox testing to avoid getting stuck
🔹 Be transparent about what was and wasn’t tested

The goal isn’t to test less — it’s to make better testing decisions under constraints.

👉 More info: LinkedIn

How do you prioritize testing?
Пост от 21.08.2026 11:13
325
0
2
🚒 Production Failure Stories: How We Saved Production
“Production is down!” – the message no engineer ever wants to see. 😅


On August 27, join Mikhail Shtura (Tech Lead / Architect, Sam Solutions) for real production incidents, their root causes, and lessons learned — no theory, just practical cases.

🔥 A bot taking down a search service
⚡️ Why Redis Cluster doesn’t guarantee HA
👻 Where “ghost” services come from
📡 How workloads can overwhelm a cluster
🛠 Turning hotfixes into long-term solutions

🎯 For: Java Developers, Team Leads, Architects, SREs & anyone working with production systems.
⏰ 19:00 Minsk / 18:00 CEST | 🕒 1 hour
🗣 Russian | 📍 Offline: Andersen Minsk
💻 Online stream available after registration

🎟 Register here
Пост от 18.08.2026 13:46
844
0
5
My QA people, can you relate?
Пост от 13.08.2026 14:53
99
0
2
How to Test Microservices Without Going Crazy 🧩

Microservices change not only architecture, but also how we test.
A service can work perfectly on its own while the whole system is broken.

The biggest risks often appear at service boundaries: incompatible contracts, changed schemas, timeouts, retries, duplicated messages, and unexpected assumptions.

A balanced strategy looks like this:
🧪 Unit tests → business logic
🔌 Integration tests → realistic interactions
📜 Contract tests → service boundaries
🌐 E2E tests → critical user journeys
📊 Production validation → real-world behaviour

Don't make E2E tests responsible for everything. A few critical scenarios can provide more confidence than hundreds of fragile E2E tests.

The goal isn't to have the maximum number of tests.
It's to have the right tests answering the right questions at the right level.

👉 Read the full post on LinkedIn
What would you add to this testing strategy?
Смотреть все посты