Телеграм канал «Ecce Verbum»

Systematic Theology - Sacramentology - Baptism [1/3] Systematic Theology usually organizes each doctrine into fundamental questions: what it is, where it is based, what it means, how it operates, who receives it, what its effects are, what controversies exist, what its place is in the life of the Church. Applying this to Baptism, a systematic treatment could follow this path: § 1. Doctrine of Baptism – Definition Nature: sacrament/ordinance instituted by Christ. Theological essence: visible and effective (or symbolic, according to tradition) sign of union with Christ. Distinction: it is not a mere social ceremony, but a religious act with soteriological significance. Key question: Is Baptism only a symbol or is it a means of grace? § 2. Biblical Foundation Old Testament – ​​Ritual purifications and washings (Leviticus 16; Numbers 19); Prophecies of inner purification (Ezekiel 36:25-27). New Testament – ​​Mandate of Christ (Matthew 28:19); Apostolic practice (Acts 2:38; 8:36; 22:16); Union with Christ in death and resurrection (Romans 6:3-4); Baptism and new birth (John 3:5; Titus 3:5; 1 Peter 3:21). Exegetical question: “Water and Spirit” means sacramental rite or spiritual renewal. § 3. Institution and Authority Christological: Christ ordains and spiritually participates in Baptism. Trinitarian: performed “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit”, linking it to Trinitarian life. Ecclesiological: entrusted to the Church, not to isolated individuals. § 4. Central Theological Meanings a) Purification from sin – Forgiveness/remission (Acts 2:38). Debates: objective vs. subjective sacramental efficacy. b) Regeneration – Some traditions: Baptism produces new birth. Others: it symbolizes a regeneration already accomplished by faith. c) Ecclesial incorporation – Insertion into the Body of Christ (1 Cor 12:13). Community identity, not just individual. d) Union with Christ – Participation in his death and resurrection (Rom 6). e) Seal and Promise – Seal of the covenant, analogy with circumcision (Col 2:11–12). § 5. Subjects of Baptism — Who can be baptized? Infant baptism (pædobaptism) – Based on the family covenant (Gen 17; Acts 16). Understanding of a community of faith. Grace precedes human decision. Believer's baptism (credobaptism) – Requires conscious faith and repentance (Acts 2:41). Sacrament as a public profession. Systematic tension: priority of grace vs. priority of personal faith. § 6. Form and Matter Matter: real water. Form: Trinitarian invocation (Mt 28:19). Mode: immersion, infusion, sprinkling — pragmatic and theological divergences regarding symbolism. § 7. Minister of Baptism Generally: ordained minister. Historical exceptions: baptism of necessity (in case of danger of death). Ecclesiological question: Baptism is an act of the Church, not a private one. § 8. Effects of Baptism Depending on tradition: Remission of original/personal sin; Infusion of sanctifying grace; Regeneration/new birth; Gift of the Holy Spirit; Divine adoption; Insertion into the Church; Vocation to holiness. Some Reformed traditions add: Objective guarantee of the promise, applied subjectively by future faith. § 9. Necessity for Salvation Three systematic positions: 1. Absolute necessity — without Baptism there is no salvation. 2. Ordinary necessity — it is the normative path, but God can act extraordinarily. 3. Symbolic necessity — it is not a requirement for salvation, but an ordained obedience. Auxiliary categories: Baptism of desire; Baptism of blood; Spiritual baptism (Protestant interpretations) § 10. Validity and Repetition – True Baptism is unique and unrepeatable. Validity depends on: water, Trinitarian formula, and right minimum intention. Ecumenical issues: validity among denominations. § 11. Historical Controversies Donatism: does validity depend on the holiness of the minister? Reformation: efficacious sacrament vs. memorial symbol. Contemporary debates: infant baptism, rebaptism, charismatic baptism “in the Spirit”. 🔗[2/3] 🔗[3/3] #baptism

From the ashes of World War I to the celebration of Christ the King. What connects these events? The last Sunday of the liturgical year is the Solemnity of Christ the King. What were the circumstances behind the establishment of this celebration? Pessimism, a sense of helplessness, compounded by hatred between nations, were overwhelming. Many considered the foundations of morality and the teachings of the Church outdated, irrelevant to 20th-century society. When Cardinal Ambrogio Achille Ratti was elected pope and took the name Pius XI, much of the world was plunged into chaos. It was 1922, and "although the bloody First World War (1914-1918) had ended, universal peace and tranquility were nowhere in sight." The devastation of European countries, the shock and suffering in Russia caused by the revolution, economic chaos, unemployment, famine, lack of political stability – this is how DD Emmons describes the situation in the world after the end of "the war that was supposed to put an end to all wars." Pessimism, a sense of helplessness, intensified by hatred between nations, were overwhelming. The time had come for tyrants to rise, and they did. The spreading philosophies of fascism, national socialism (Nazism), and communism gave rise to figures like Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, and Joseph Stalin. Many considered the foundations of morality and the teachings of the Church to be outdated in 20th-century society. Christ, it seemed, could be king at most in an individual's private life, but certainly not in public life. Some political regimes also sought to remove him from family life. Amidst all these events, the new Pope Pius XI saw that people were rejecting Christ, preferring a lifestyle dominated by secularism, material benefits and false hope created by tyrants.  Pius XI first dedicated his reign as pope to "Pax Christi in Regno Christi." In 1925, when the Church celebrated the 1600th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, he continually emphasized Christ's kingship, and on December 11, he issued the encyclical "Quas Primas," establishing the feast of Our Lord Jesus Christ the King. The encyclical stipulated that the feast of Christ the King would be celebrated annually on the last Sunday in October. This date, one week before All Saints' Day and four weeks before Advent, was carefully chosen: it reminded people that Jesus Christ is not only the King of this world, reigning today among the nations; He is also the eternal King, glorified by the saints in heaven, who will one day come to judge all humanity. In his encyclical, he noted that the constant unrest of that era, which he called a ‘social plague,’ had been building for a long time and was the result of the rejection of Christ by the nations,” he added. A fragment from the document: "Christ, who was excluded from public life, despised, neglected and ignored, will avenge these outrages most severely; for His royal dignity demands that the state take into account God's commandments and Christian principles, both in making laws and in administering justice, and also in providing a sound moral education for the young." Pius called on Catholics to make reparation for the widespread atheism practiced in many countries. In 1969 Paul VI changed the name of the celebration to the Feast of "Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe" ("Domini Nostri Iesu Christi universorum Regis") to emphasize Christ's universal reign. He also changed the date to the last Sunday of the liturgical year, further emphasizing the connection between Christ's kingship and His Second Coming. more: 🔗The social Kingship of Christ

Development of Catholic Doctrine - Evolution, Revolution, or an Organic Progress? (2007) Dave Armstrong #doctrine

Article From the Shema to the Homoousios: The Jewish Roots and New Testament Origins of the Nicene Creed By Robert M Bowman Jr. https://www.academia.edu/145036921/From_the_Shema_to_the_Homoousios_The_Jewish_Roots_and_New_Testament_Origins_of_the_Nicene_Creed #christology

The Fathers of the Church 3rd Edition An Introduction to the First Christian Teachers Mike Aquilina #earlychurch

Calculus for Mathematicians, Computer Scientists, and Physicists - An Introduction to Abstract Mathematics (n.d.) Andrew D. Hwang #mathematics

Are All Statements from the Ecumenical Councils Infallible Pronouncements? Michal Hunt [1/3] The truth is not every pronouncement at an ecumenical council is infallible, but there is no short answer to this question. I will do my best to provide the shortest long answer I can give. Some pronouncements of Ecumenical Councils deal with matters of faith and morals while others may be of a disciplinary or prudential nature and are not infallible statements. If you refer to the Vatican II document, Lumen Gentium 25, you will find that this document carefully points out exactly when and where the voice of the Magisterium speaks with the great voice of infallibility. Let's first consider the places, according to Lumen Gentium 25, where the Magisterium speaks infallibly. To begin with many moral norms are taught infallibly but it is necessary to distinguish between the Extraordinary Magisterium and the Ordinary Magisterium. "Extraordinary" and "ordinary" refer to the manner in which a truth is stated by the Church whether that truth is infallible or whether it is not. Using the parent-child relationship as a model – when you correct or remind your children about good manners, say for example, that they should remember to say "thank you" when a waiter in a restaurant brings them their meal, that is an "ordinary" exercise of your authority as a parent. But, if you were to write up a set of rules for proper behavior when going out to eat and you were to announce these rules officially at a special family meeting that would be an "extraordinary" exercise of your parental authority. It is in this way that the Magisterium – which consists of both a papal and an episcopal dimension –, can exercise authority over the Church. When the Pope speaks "ex cathedra", or "from the chair" (of St. Peter), as Christ's Vicar of the Kingdom of Heaven in a papal statement, or when an ecumenical council at which many bishops – the successors of the Apostles – are gathered issue an official statement, this would be an example of the Magisterium (mother Church) teaching in an "extraordinary" manner. It might be a little clearer if I broke down the two components into the Extraordinary Papal Magisterium and the Extraordinary Episcopal Magisterium... notice the difference between the technical terms "define" and "teach". I. THE EXTRAORDINARY PAPAL MAGISTERIUM: A. In the Extraordinary Papal Magisterium the Pope acts alone and speaks ex cathedra in defending a dogma (truth) of the Church. This has only happened twice in the 2,000 year history of the Church: > The Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary was defined in 1854 by Pius IX; and > The Assumption of the Virgin Mary was defined in 1950 by Pius XII. Notice I said "defined" – this was not a new truth but a truth that had been taught since the earliest years of the Church but which had not been defined as an article of Catholic faith. When dogma is taught infallibly it is required that the faithful in an "assent of faith" accept the truth of the Church's teaching. B. In the Extraordinary Episcopal Magisterium the bishops gather in ecumenical councils and in their role as the successors of the Apostles can: Define dogmas: There have been 21 ecumenical councils held throughout the history of the Church at which certain truths have been defined. Probably the most familiar to us the Nicene-Constantinople Creed we recite at Mass which is an infallible definition which came from the Great Councils of Nicaea in 325 AD and Constantinople in 381 AD. Other examples would be the Council of Chalcedon in 451 which defined the two natures of Christ or the Council of Trent (a really long one) ending in 1561 which defined the seven sacraments. These councils can also define dogmas by renouncing heresy like the Council of Ephesus in 431 which proclaimed against a heresy called Nestorianism and declared the Virgin Mary not just the mother of a man named Jesus but the Mother of God! 🔗[2/3] 🔗[3/3] 🔗source