Инструменты
Мониторинг
Новое
Детальная статистика
Анализ аудитории
Telegraph-статьи
Бот аналитики
Полезная информация
Инструкция Telemetr
Документация к API
Чат Telemetr
Полезные сервисы
Защита от накрутки
Создать своего бота
Продать/Купить канал
Монетизация
Не попадитесь на накрученные каналы! Узнайте, не накручивает ли канал просмотры или
подписчиков
Проверить канал на накрутку
Телеграм канал «Catherine Edwards Life»
Подписчики
Всего
5 111
Сегодня
-1
Просмотров на пост
Всего
330
ER
Общий
7.43%
Суточный
4%
Динамика публикаций
Telemetr - сервис глубокой аналитики
телеграм-каналов
телеграм-каналов
Получите подробную информацию о каждом канале
Отберите самые эффективные каналы для
рекламных размещений, по приросту подписчиков,
ER, количеству просмотров на пост и другим метрикам
рекламных размещений, по приросту подписчиков,
ER, количеству просмотров на пост и другим метрикам
Анализируйте рекламные посты
и креативы
и креативы
Узнайте какие посты лучше сработали,
а какие хуже, даже если их давно удалили
а какие хуже, даже если их давно удалили
Оценивайте эффективность тематики и контента
Узнайте, какую тематику лучше не рекламировать
на канале, а какая зайдет на ура
на канале, а какая зайдет на ура
Показано 7 из 2812 постов
Смотреть все посты
Пост от 27.11.2025 15:15
151
1
0
Long before modern pharmaceuticals, many cultures relied on plant medicine, intuition, and holistic approaches to support healing.
In the early 1900s, major reforms in medical education — including what became known as the Flexner Report — reshaped the entire landscape of healthcare. Funded by powerful industrial interests of the time, these reforms pushed natural and herbal traditions to the margins and prioritised a new biomedical model.
Many schools teaching traditional or nature-based practices were closed, while the emerging system focused heavily on lab-created, patented treatments.
Whatever people believe about that shift, it’s clear that a huge part of our healing heritage was sidelined in the process.
Nature was never the ‘alternative’ — for most of human history, it was the starting point.
Пост от 26.11.2025 20:15
221
3
1
Have you ever noticed how natural health information is often dismissed, mocked, or quietly pushed out of mainstream platforms?
It raises an important question: why is there so much resistance to conversations about diet, lifestyle, and nature-based approaches that support the body’s own healing systems?
When an industry’s model depends on ongoing customers, it naturally prioritises treatments that maintain that structure. Preventative, low-cost, self-directed health practices don’t fit neatly into that framework — and that creates tension.
This isn’t about blaming individuals; it’s about acknowledging incentives.
Because when people learn how to support their health in ways that reduce dependency, it changes the entire landscape.
🔥
2
Пост от 26.11.2025 13:32
301
0
3
This is a MUST watch video - times are tough, we need to stick together and support oursleves - so why not take a high consciousness energy filed whereever you go? Plaese watch / share as youtube doesnt like videos that help people help themselves! https://youtu.be/9lPb5NFGfxw?si=cdlyw_RZaBxSZTan
👍
1
Пост от 26.11.2025 12:39
238
0
0
We spend hundreds of billions every year on cancer research — yet cancer rates have climbed dramatically since the 1990s. Something isn’t adding up.
Instead of pouring endless money into the same cycle, maybe it’s time we start asking harder questions about what’s happening in our environment and daily lives.
We’re surrounded by chemical exposures, ultra-processed foods, polluted air and water, chronic stress, and a lifestyle that works against the body’s natural ability to repair.
Imagine if the same level of investment went into:
– reducing environmental toxins
– improving food quality
– protecting clean water
– supporting true preventative health
– and educating people on how to build resilience from the inside out
Real health starts long before a diagnosis. And people deserve transparency, informed choice, and real solutions.
👍
2
Пост от 21.11.2025 11:53
493
4
0
Изображение
Изображение
Изображение
Изображение
Изображение
Изображение
👍
2
Пост от 20.11.2025 16:29
437
2
2
A conspiracy simply means two or more people planning something — often criminal — together.
It’s in courtrooms every single day.
It’s not a dirty word.
The only reason it became negative is because it threatened the people hiding behind the curtain.
When you hear “conspiracy” and automatically add “theory”…
that’s not logic — that’s programming.
And once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
🎧 Watch the full conversation: https://youtu.be/9CIew76Gwy8
#QuestionEverything #TruthMatters #Conspiracy #CriticalThinking #Awakening #CatherineEdwardsPodcast
👍
3
Пост от 20.11.2025 16:28
267
1
1
It’s amazing how one word has been used to silence an entire generation of critical thinkers.
Most people don’t realise that the term “conspiracy theorist” wasn’t organic — it was engineered. A psychological operation. A tool designed to embarrass, discredit, and shut people up.
After the JFK assassination, too many people were asking the right questions. Too many were noticing the lies and inconsistencies. And the agencies involved needed a way to stop the public from digging any deeper.
So in 1964, the CIA pushed out a strategy: weaponise the word “conspiracy theory.”
Turn it into a joke. Make people cringe at the label. Make them doubt their own instincts.
And it worked — brilliantly. Say the word “conspiracy” today and most people automatically hear “theory,” even if you never said it. That’s how deep the conditioning runs. Better than any marketing campaign in history.
But here’s the truth:
Видео/гифка
👍
2